| The HUP Rating are a unique and copyrighted algorithm. Handicapping with them is not what you might be used to. They take some time to get the feel. They are track specific. What works at one track, might not work at another track. The basics might be the same, but each track will need to be tweaked to its specifics. The logic might go against some of your handicapping principles. It might not be for you, but great success can come to you if you put some effort into it. We overlook some factors you feel might be important, and it will be up to you to incorporate those factors into handicapping with our ratings, if you feel you need to. But rest assured if you are seriously looking for success, no matter what your goal, it takes time and effort. The interpretation of this data is critical! We present for you an example card, Aqueduct 11/07/08. You can view it using WordPad or another text reader and print it out as well if you wish. This card was not used because it was our most profitable day or it presented many long shots, we have had much better days, even a day that an opportunity to hit a Pick Six at Saratoga that went unhit! We have had less profitable days as well. We used this day as it presented some of the many situations that point to potential winners. Follow along with the explanations presented. Generally, we are not looking for horses under 2 to 1. Off tracks, might present a bit different situation and until you have the feel, they might better be avoided. But keep in mind that they may present great betting opportunities as well, so keep track of those situations. If a race seems that many of the horses have positive signs, either pass the race or look for the best price and only bet lightly or box a few in an exotic wager. Preference is to pass the race or bet lightly. We like races that have only a few horses we really need to consider and that we still will get value. Generally, we only use the last race, unless you believe there was a valid excuse, you might want to look at the next to last race, we tend to just use the last race. Again, this handicapping approach will take time to get the feel. It offers great value as not many will have your unique insight into the race, hence giving you better prices at the window. Please spend the time to get the feel of it. Click the race links on the sidebar of this page for detailed comments and directions of use. Data that has been underlined in the first two example races, are parameters being referenced in the comments. Later races do not have the underlines, as the first two races should make it clear enough. This example day of races contains the actual figs for that day and the results are actual race results and payoffs. Column Heading Explanations: D : this number refers to how many days ago that race was Tcx: track condition, first letter(f = fst(dirt) or frm(turf), g = gd, m = my, etc Trk : the particular track that the race was ran Dist : the distance of that race Sf : the surface that the race was ran on CV+- : the estimated class value of the race. Positive values represent an edge in todays competition. Negatives represent a tougher field in todays race, then it raced against in its last race. Type : the race type (Claimer, Maiden, Etc) Fig1, Fig2, Fig3, Fig4, Fig5 : The first part refers to the power the race itself demanded (example the 12 in 12:14). The second number is the actual power exerted by that particular horse for that part of the race (the 14 in 12:14 ). In this example the horse exceeded the demand by 2, this is strong. If the numbers were 12:5, it would be a minus 7, this would be a poor performance at that point of the race. A minus 7, many times, especially at an important point of the race is enough to eliminate the horse from contention in todays race. Depending on the track played, where a horse exceeds or under performs its expected figure, might be more important at one point of a race than another. At Aqueduct, for example, the trend seems to the second fig(Fig2) or Fig3 is most important, especially Fig2 for races at a mile and under. Races over a mile, we tend to look at the later HUP figs as well(Fig4 and Fig5). At other times, when we see an amazing Fig4 or Fig5, say, 4:11(a plus 7 or literally outran the race at that point), this can also point to a strong next performance. The higher the number the faster that portion of the race was ran. R/Htot : total of race HUP figs and horse total(race fig first, horse fig is second) FigAvg : average of race HUP fig and average of horse fig FigDif : the difference between the two average HUP figs(due to rounding and decimal places displayed, might appear to be incorrect, but it is not) NOTE:?????????????? For races previously ran at 4 furlong, the horse will only have 2 HUP ratings For races previously ran at 4 1/2 & 5 furlongs, the horse will have 3 ratings For races previously ran over 5 furlongs thru and including 1 Mile, there will be 4 ratings For races previously ran over 1 Mile, horses will have 5 ratings |
| PP MATCH-UP EXPLANATION PAGE PLEASE READ This Page Thoroughly Before Proceeding To The Example Races On The Sidebar |
| Actual Race Examples With Explanations & Comments For Usage (Click Races Below) |